slippery

One of the most popular arguments against gay marriage is that if we legalize gay marriage it’s a slippery slope to legalizing polygamy and beastiality. My response is: so what? People who are in favor of gay marriage are far too quick to dismiss these other forms of non-traditional marriage.

Can anybody think of a single reason why polygamy or beastiality is bad other than “it’s unnatural”, “it’s disgusting”, or “I hate it”?

Remember, we should never be legislating taste and if somebody wants to have sex with his cow who are we to judge? If somebody is in love with two women, or three, or four, or five, who are we to judge them and say they can’t get married?

There’s an argument that it’s dangerous: diseases can be transmitted between humans and animals, and polygamous relationships might lead to bad parenting. If disease is a problem practice safe sex, and polygamous marriages don’t lead to any worse parenting than “traditional” relationships.

Let’s also remember that the law will neither stop nor encourage this behavior. Somebody crazy enough to have sex with a cow is going to have sex with a cow regardless of whether it’s legal. Somebody in love with two women is going to sleep with both of them regardless of what the law says.

So, I ask you: if we’re going to legalize gay marriage, why not legalize other non-traditional forms of marriage along the way?

Tags: , , , ,

89 Comments on What’s Wrong With Polygamy And Beastiality?

  1. jen says:

    what is the difference between bestiality and pedophilia?

    neither can verbally consent, but most people dont verbally consent. an animal could sortof show consent by doing something like rubbing against the human or not backing away. but a child could be seen as sexually teasing an adult or not backing away when theyre being molested. that does not mean the child is consenting.

    perhaps the difference is development? an animal would most likely be fully developed at the time of “the act”. but a human child is still just a child.
    an adult animal does have sexual urges, a child does not.
    but neither could understand whats happening as well as the adult human.

    this is an honest question.

  2. Philip says:

    What is the difference between bestiality and pedophilia?

    Actually, that is a good question. From my perspective, the difference is that we don’t slaughter and eat human children.

    In other words, my argument is that since we slaughter and eat animals and that’s clearly worse than shagging them, it’s pretty hypocritical of us to say that bestiality is wrong.

    However, that argument clearly doesn’t apply to pedophilia.

    But, there is another question: what exactly is wrong with pedophilia? What’s wrong is that you can’t force yourself on people, obviously (regardless of how young or old they are). However, I do not believe that child molestation is “the most heinous crime imaginable” that people seem to think it is.

    We expect that children who are molested will be emotionally traumatized, scarred for life, require therapy, etc., but why? What exactly is traumatic about being molested OTHER than society telling the kid that he should be traumatized? For example, given the choice, I would much rather have some strange man touch my private parts than have the crap beaten out of me and my legs broken. Why? Isn’t it obvious? If I’m molested I can just shake it off, but if my legs are broken I may never walk again.

    Anyway, I think molested children would be better off if we told them something simple like, “Yes, Timmy, what that man did was wrong, but he’s in jail now so there’s nothing to worry about. Now, let’s go get you an ice cream cone and you can have a wonderful life!” Instead, we make a big deal out of it: we pity the kids, throw them into therapy, tell them they should feel bad and in pain for the rest of their life, tell them that they will never recover, tell them that they went through the most horrible ordeal of their life, etc. That doesn’t seem like what we should be telling them… I mean, little Timmy probably doesn’t even know what happened. If it wasn’t for adults telling him how horrible it was, he wouldn’t know.

    Anyway, obviously child molestation should be and is a crime, it just seems to me that child assault, for example, is much worse.

  3. Lee says:

    This is funny, yet thought provoking. Having sex with children or animals does fall under the realm of sex without consent since neither the child nor the animal actually knows that the person is indulging in sex with them for pleasure. At the same time, due to media, the number of children getting educated in sex as well as experimenting at an early age is increasing rapidly. I personally know psychiatrists who counsel young children addicted to pornography and masturbation. So there is a high probability that children may indeed be consenting sexual act with adults. Now talking about polygamy and incest, well, they are acts between consenting adults so there need not be any law forbidding such acts. With latest contraceptive methods, people need not fear procreating retarded children in the case of incest and as the author told, it is no one’s business if a man sleeps with multiple women if they all consent for the same. There is one other thing. When people present this issue, people say “Oh this is so offensive because you are comparing gay marriage with incest or polygamy”. That is wrong since no one is comparing one with the other. Gay sex, polygamy, incest and bestiality were all taboo for a long time even though people practiced them in private. Now that gay sex has been approved, other things should also follow because that is the way they prefer to live their lives and everybody has a right to live their lives the way they want.

  4. Sylvia says:

    A marriage should be a relationship, which both parts wanted. An animal can’t say yes, and I am not sure if a cow really has fun when the farmer jumps on.

    To the molested children: In the days of Freud, the Children had problems, but nobody believes the, and neither they was pushed in a trauma. In opposite of, as the children said, that they has been molested from the father, he said, the children wants to have sex with his parents so hard, they think, it already has been happened. The reaction you told was something, that molested children get all the time, even today. And no, they don’t feel better then.

  5. nora says:

    I think that any subject about sex is a taboo depending in people. So the shame reflects the way you feel. In some society even two adultes who are havinf sex without being married is a crime and the couple specially the female would feel the guilt all her life just like she was molested or raped. I think that our biggest propleme is how Society set up our brains. I’m not saying that rape or molestation is ok I was amolested child my self and i still have hard time dealing with it evey day but it because I think about it every day and it’s in subconscience as a shamy thing. But here is a hint, I remember hiding my puberty from my friends my family from my father being ashamed of it just because my mother get scared and she realized that I’m a women. I was ashamed for a while like me now being ashamed of being abused as a child. Like spiritual peole say the big ennemy is our brain because we fill it up with informations that are sometimes so wrong and it keep screaming to us as a warning when it realizes that some of the informations just happened.I think that we sould treat molestation and rape with an other prespective. Sorry if I infended the language it is not my maternel one.

  6. paslo says:

    you can easily argue that an animal can consent to sex for pleasure only when you take a look at the k9/female interaction: will a k9 mount a woman if she permits it? yes
    Will the k9 call her the next day? no.

    only difference is that at least human men provide cab fare to the woman (usually)

    i have similar logic for consent of man/animal. however, i think the above points out a very basic fact: Animals are willing to entertain the notion of sex with other animals outside their species (also proven in many scientific journals) in exchange for pleasure. They mearly do not have the superstitions and stigmatas that we humans carry due to society. (“OMG!” says rover to his dog shrink “I’m going to DOGGIE HELL!”)

  7. ItsJustMe says:

    I was chatting on a kink site with a group who practices both role play incest (Daddy daughter) and child sex (age play). Now I have had both experiences as role play, and see nothing wrong with that. But in reality? well incest is a moral issue with genetic ramifications that can be overcome with rubbers or vasectomy etc. My wife was raped by her uncle and it messed with her even as a young girl, it’s wrong. But when is it right? (this is where I lost the crowd) While being clear with my stance I said it is interesting that nature tells us we are physically ready for sex at at around 10-13 years of age simply by having us sexually mature at that time. So while socially we agree that we are not ready for sex until 18, nature has other ideas…hmmmmm ( I still don’t condone child rape, burn those pedophile priests, take down the papistry

  8. NobodyImportant says:

    Ran across this article from a random search. You always hear those guys at school saying search for this or search for that. Its almost always something you dont want to see. Boredom made me search and I found this but thats not the point. The point is what really is taboo and what is not? True many things have once been considered taboo in the past but are now happening everyday. Yes, some people would find it offensive to compare beastiality with incest or gay sex or any of the other acts that are condsidered to be taboo. However, it makes me wonder if they stop to think. All of these “taboo” acts are not so different from each other. All of them are considered to be shameful by society. Personally I see nothing wrong with “shagging” anyone/anything you love, as long as they are sexually mature and you dont force yourself on them. On the subject of incest in particular, when I was young I was seduced by my older sister. She did not force herself on me and I am not traumatized. She is dead now but she left me with many great memories and I miss her alot. My point is yes you could say I was molested as a child, however it does not bother me. I actually miss those moments when we were together and I even fell in love with someone who reminds me of my older sister. Sure I didnt know exactly what was going on when we were “shagging” but I did know that it felt great and in the end it made our bond as brother and sister much stronger. So stop and think before you judge anyone for what they like to do. Everyone has a reason for doing something, make sure yours is a good reason. LaterZ

  9. Tyler says:

    Well if you introduce sex at such a young age aren’t they susceptible to sex addiction? I don’t think it’s very responsible on the adults part because he/she is ignoring that they are not mentally mature yet. Sex/love addiction is a terrible thing. And if we want to evolve as a human species, we need to keep STD’s away at least at some degree because not every single person is actually going to use a condom or some other form of protection. Now the k9 to female thing I can sort of agree with. I mean as long as she’s protected I guess it’s fine. Now when you have a person doing an animal, I would consider this rape. Simply because you just don’t know if the animal actually wants to do it or finds it uncomfortable. Oh and let’s all not forget trauma on all of these subjects.

  10. Gggggh says:

    Dicks

  11. Anonymous says:

    Truthfully the only true standard and reason for marriage is the Bible, and the biblical principals (that this country was founded on btw and is the only reason that this sadly declining culture has survived this long in my opinion). The Bible clearly states that marriage is to be between one man and one woman.

  12. Philip says:

    @Anonymous

    … but marriage existed before the Bible was written.

    So tell me, do you not believe in cause and effect, or do not believe that time is linear?

    And what about non-Christians? They get married too, you know.

  13. Bo says:

    @Philip,

    I think this is just for clarification. Given that you believe the Bible and its contents are true, then marriage certainly did exist before the Bible was written, but you would also have to believe that marriage was first created by God at the very beginning and then later recorded by God through man.

    But seeing as that you probably don’t believe that the Bible is true (since in another post you state that you believe the Bible to be false), the way you question Anonymous is fair.

    And non-Christians do get married as well. I don’t think Anonymous was denying that reality. He or she was merely saying that his or her respective country’s marriage institution was founded on biblical principles and that’s why men still marry women (and vice versa) to this day, whether or not they do it with knowledge that it’s based on biblical principles.

  14. vvbrown says:

    well think bestality is not .OK but zoophilia is similar but means you love that animal. Since when did humans take orders. We are a lieing and cheat in race.But we all love each other in one way. I love zoophilia. But most WOMEN do it not men. Putting down a women has always been bad. so why does that change now. there are more males then females. So of course you see them fucking animals. i personally thick it is not wrong some women may only love one man.
    But not like a super star. Ever watch a anime harem. They wish they could marry all. Do really wanna force people to be good. If god loved an animal or several women , we never stop him. No out of fear but respect.We are all half gods in my eyes. Jesus is or brother. So if i have that strange fetish don’t judge it is immposible to resist. But falling into temption and lust is wrong. Do you get it all humans a hypocrites.

  15. vvbrown says:

    also never rush that is ape no form of rape is ok it is one of the great sins. GOD ALWAYS LOVES US.

  16. vvbrown says:

    Wait i know something : doesn’t all love always go back to sex if not character. Are we not all humans. God did not make animals for us to make or slaves. being gay has to do with character not sex. So why does it always go back to that. If humanity had never advanced we be apes fucking all sorts of animals.So does watching make me wrong. God sits in heaven watching us. Are you calling him non holy. So don’t judge humans only act this way since they think we are better. If you think it is so wrong make an animal translator. but raping children is always wrong. if that is your thing watch hentai . Humans don’t always act on feelings.

  17. Marissa says:

    I agree with most of your posts but I don’t agree that you should trivialize molestation of children, that’s just a little too far. I don’t know if you are a psychologist to make the generalization that a child can “shake off” being molested. There has been substantive research linked to child molestation and disorders such as post traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, depression and suicide in people who have been molested, (and rape in adults as well). Many of these children have indicated these traits before even admitting to the abuse to an adult or parent, and many times the parents are confused by the child’s behaviour. And are you going to tell me, as stated previously that a child understands that “molestation is wrong because we are led to believe it’s wrong” when they are five years old, don’t even know what molestation is, and already develop negative mental disorders which are debilitating to their development mentally and health? Molestation is obviously naturally wrong if they suffer from it, without even knowing what is happening to them is wrong. “Yes, Timmy, what that man did was wrong, but he’s in jail now so there’s nothing to worry about. Now, let’s go get you an ice cream cone and you can have a wonderful life!” Philip you definitely have alot of knowledge about alot of subjects, but knowledge is not always power. You lose alot of your credibility and your ability to convince people because of your lack of empathy. I’m not sure who you are, you sound like an arrogant University student who is going through a Philosophy Major or something. Use your education, whatever it may be, and start being more empathetic, people will listen to you then.

  18. Rachel says:

    Was going to spend some time on your little site this evening, now I just want to say fuck off asshat, you’re nasty for even thinking this shit and minimalizing what it really is! Seriously, you can trot off to hell now.

  19. tim says:

    however my friend, people are animals themselves and fuck other animals without any protection. and after theyre done fucking animals they go back to fucking people again which once again dont use protection and spread nasty shit like aids and hiv. so u support that shit all u want, because it is the end of our already weakening immune systems and dying breed of regular people. u know how aids and hiv was invented? one horny ass nigger fucked a monkey and then fucked other women. i hope u get boned in the ass by a horse and then die 2-3 months later, sick fuckhead. marriage with an animal is sickening and fucking degrating to the human poplutation. are we really letting ourselves go that much? no christian shit over here this is fact. the bloody thing hardly has a brain and the other has an even smaller one. how about u stick ur dick in a toaster and call it marriage?

  20. Roxxy says:

    idk. I was molested by my father as a child. its made life difficult and I have blamed alot of my curiosities on what happened to me…. I had sex with girls before I ever let a man touch me. I was addicted to masterbating…. and i let a dog lick me. I felt dirty and ashamed and I dont think I will do it again. But the strange thing is my husband just informed me that it was something he was into…i told him no it is wrong… he pointed out who makes it wrong? If it feels good and tthe animal was not forced or harmed, why deny onesself pleasure? Idk i kinda went off subject. Its easy to talk about the subject but has anyone really thought to ask the people that have had these things happen to them or even take part in these things… We are polygamists but we like sex and sex with other people that are willing and that doesnt make me a bad person. I have a family and I work for a living and am not hurting any one… And what my dad did to me was wrong, but id rather take that then be maimed or what not…. just a thought people

  21. Bryce says:

    Ehhh… Tough decision i mean honestly marriage shouldnt be between a man and a woman it should be between 2 people who love each other, even if that calls forth loving 2 or even 3 people at once… It doesnt matter… Beastiality on the other hand, although a bit disturbing for me

  22. Bryce says:

    Im sorry didnt finish… Anyway even i personally find it a bit wierd it is however not bad… Everyone has urges, wether its have sex with a person, have sex with 3 people, or even have sex with a cow, it makes no difference… As humans i believe we are set here to learn from mistakes, the conciquence is whatever the outcome of our mistake is… Thank you

  23. Charles says:

    If a man is having it with a female animal, the animal tells him if she likes it. A dog will bite a person, and a horse might actually kill him.

  24. Charles says:

    Also, mules and ligers are mixtures of animals. Two animals of different species are “consenting”. We are a species. Furthermore, how do animals “consent” to “mate”?

  25. J says:

    How can you compare gay marriage to being homosexual or fucking animals?

  26. Jake says:

    Polygymy i see no problem with, as long as all members of the marriage consent. it should be legalized the same as gay marriage. The issue with beastiality is one of consent. If aam wamts to have sex with his cow, thats fine as long as the cow consents, which is an issue in that there is no way for the cow too show consent. The man is not safely having sex woth his cow, he is raping it, which is the same issue as pedophilia has, consent cannot be assured to be given, and thus the sex is assumed to be rape. Thus polygemy is fine, but beastiality has legal issues in the animals consent, and thus should never be legalized

  27. Alex says:

    Perhaps the real issue is “Judgement” … no-one can truly know another’s journey, no-one can know what has transpired that moves them in that way.

    It is so easy to say The Bible says, how many people know the actual history of that book, the edits & the re-writes .. and it is not alone … and it is often used as a simple cop-out.

    As humans at our core level all any of us want is to be accepted, warts and all. In acceptance healing and something beautiful happens ..

    Just because a thing weird’s you out, it does not make it wrong .. perhaps you harbor a similar desire but cannot express it .. who knows. In the end if someone is attracted to or curious about bestiality or polygamy who am I to judge …

    I believe there is as simple philosophy to which we can all adhere … “Do No Harm” … it’s not rocket science … and everyone knows what is forced & what is not, it is simply that some people rationalize something to assuage their own guilt

  28. Husky says:

    There isn’t anything inherently wrong with bestiality, polygamy and even incest. Society tends to blur lines and make connections against things deemed to be uncomfortable. Bestiality is one of my favorite topics to discuss when around people who are willing to discuss it in a civil manner.

    Often when people are ranting against bestiality they tend to use phrases like “rape” and “abuse”. These are shock words intended to incite anger, often preventing people from evaluating the topic at hand. And allows the person(s) making these claims to brush off anyone who dares to challenge their perspective.

    Truth be told, sexual contact with an animal is not automatically abusive. For an animal to be abused there has to be some form of tangible harm, whether it be physical or mental. It can and has been proven that simply having sexual contact with an animal doesn’t prove harmful to the animal in question.

    It’s how you have sex with an animal that proves harmful, obviously if you don’t know what you are doing or are reckless you can very well hurt an animal as easily as you could hurt a human. Classifying bestiality as abuse is a misstep…

    Rape, it’s true you can force yourself onto an animal. But considering all the other interactions we force onto animals, what makes sexual contact any more dastardly than slaughter, forced breeding and trotting them along through animal shows? I contend it’s our society’s fear of just about everything sexual. Killing your neighbor’s dog is a destruction of property charge, given a fine and ordered to pay the owner the value of the property. Having sex with your neighbors dog is a felony with a prison sentence; in a number of states.

    But animals are capable of giving consent, even if not on the same level as human beings. Anyone who’s had contact with an animal, or have ever had a pet knows that animals love some things and hate others. An example would be like trying to bathe a cat, cats are known to throw a fit if you put them in water.

    In short the majority of anti-bestiality arguments are based around personal distaste and then built upon by speculative logic to seek the desired outcome. Rather than recognizing bestiality for what it is, people against it deem it as abuse and close their mind to any challenge of that idea.

  29. Kevin says:

    Husky hit the nail on the head with that one!! ;) Anyone that says abuse or rape is only provoking anger and rage in the person caring to challenge the other’s beliefs…

  30. Kevin says:

    BTW, I’m a zoosexual and if you find that wrong, than if you don’t believe the Bible to be true and yet you still read it and have that faith (automatically making you a hypocrite), then you’ll also have to agree that homosexuality is also shameful, Biblically speaking, that is!

  31. hakan says:

    I wanna think of another point of this subject..what would happen if we put 50 single men and 50 single women in an island and watched how they matched?)..10 attractive guys would somehow have relationships with all of the women,and other 40 guys would get women by luck,or worstly couldnt get any.(of course I counted “cheating” )..as we can see..female nature created polygamy,not male nature..;)..this is not a matter of logic,religious beliefs etc..this is a matter of female nature..:)

  32. Integrity says:

    Argument: All things that people do ever, including murder, all sex acts, all forms of mutilation, all forms of theft and harassment and playing God are acceptable and beautiful and anyone who disagrees or is offended is a judgmental and probably religious moron.

    Why this argument fails: Being open-minded doesn’t mean having to agree with everything people do ever. It is perfectly natural to be offended, disgusted, harmed or threatened by something without it meaning you are judgmental or irrational.

    Argument: Any will to perform any sexual act is natural, rational and beautiful, while any idea that your sexuality is something that has meaning to the quality of your life is simply irrational and judgmental.

    Why this argument fails: Human beings are perfectly capable of making decisions about what sexual acts to perform and what not to perform, based on their own rational thoughts about their own sexual integrity and quality of life, completely independent on religions and cultural bias.

    Argument: Sexual relations between humans and animals is beautiful and natural and anyone who disagrees is close-minded and has an irrational view of sexuality.

    Why this argument fails: If humans have to be open and accepting to the idea that sex between a human and an animal is natural, then just the same they have to be open to the idea that sexuality is natural when exclusively between humans who value their sexuality as something meaningful because they are excluding unnatural, harmful, demeaning or humiliating acts from their life.

    Argument: A human having sex with an animal isn’t harming or offending anyone and anyone who is harmed or offended by any kind of sexuality doesn’t understand nature.

    Why this argument fails: Having sex with an animal hurts the human in the same way that cutting out a part of your brain or murdering your family does; It effectively destroys and warps all the natural and healthy parts of your body and your mind; You are here to be a human, to be natural, to be alive and to be healthy – Abusing your own sexuality with a creature of another species is in all ways against all that is human, all that is positive life force. It does harm the animal, it can physically harm their health and it does harm them mentally and emotionally. Having sex with an animal is similar to having sex with an infant, someone gravely mentally disabled or someone who can’t see, hear, feel or understand anything. Animals aren’t below humans, but their minds and bodies work in completely different ways, although abled to communicate emotionally with humans, they are not the same as humans. Just like mutilating a dog’s body, feeding it dog meat, giving it plastic surgery and giving it steroids warps the natural anatomy and instincts of an animal, so does sexual intercourse with an animal warp its natural instincts and view of the world from the primitive point of view of their own species. Having sex with an animal also harms those uninvolved – If you have sex with a horse, you offend everyone who will meet you or who will meet that horse, not just from the point of view that their view of sexuality is “superior” to yours, but rather due to appropriate sexual integrity; No one should have to unknowingly eat the meat of a horse that has been raped by a human or have surgery performed by someone who has raped a horse. This is not because sex with animals is ultimately “wrong”, but because sexual integrity and purity is important from a point of view of personal safety and the right to be in control of anything sexual in your own life, rather from the point of view of religion or moral.

    Ultimately, no one can effectively keep anyone from their choices or their thoughts; Although with the belief that nothing ever is “wrong” or “unacceptable”, then neither is it wrong to murder someone or simply stop someone from commiting a negative action.

    Before doing something unnatural to an animal, please, please ask yourself these questions:
    *Will this act somehow harm myself? Will it destroy my view of my own self-worth? Will it make my life unbearable for myself in the future?
    *Will this act somehow harm the animal? Will it confuse the animal or warp the animal’s natural instincts?
    *Will this somehow harm people who will interact with the animal in the future? Is this someone else’s pet? Will someone eat the meat of this animal?
    *Will this somehow harm people who will interact with me? Is it possible people can be harmed simply from learning what I have done?

    Hopefully, the answers will change your mind and help you from doing something harmful.

    Love, the Angel of Sexual Integrity and Personal Space

  33. Anonymous says:

    I see nothing wrong with beastiality other than if the animal is doing you up the butt it can lead to death, at least with horses it can. polygamy however it has been shown that the more wives a man has, the more likely one or more of the wives will have mental health issues. i also see nothing wrong with polygamy as long as the woman is truly giving consent, not being forced into it as is often the case.

  34. jonathon says:

    Individuals are sick AND DANGEROUS if they are perverted enough to have relations with beasts. And relations with beasts is bestiality. Beastmasters have so much self-contempt and self-loathing because they’ve never done anything useful in their pathetic life. They stroke, fondle, cuddle, snuggle, kiss, french kiss and even lie with these diseased beasts. All beasts are diseased: that’s why they are called beasts; although those who are intimate with beasts stare at their genitals so they call them he’s or she’s.
    Beasts will rut anything. It is no different from all those who go to bars, get wasted and rut in the bathroom with urine and feces.
    Beasts carry diseases: E.coli. Beastmasters watch their beasts lick the urine, feces and e.coli off their crotches and then let the beasts lick the feces onto their own faces. Everyone who speaks out against me allows beasts to lick their feces on them: BEASTMASTERS ARE DIRTY. Urine and feces and disease don’t bother them. They are like naive, slow children who would wallow in feces and never care.
    Beastmasters have no love for themselves or they wouldn’t degrade themselves to masturbating on beasts. All relations with beasts is masturbating.

  35. Jackson says:

    Just finished reading through all of the comments here. Some of you guys have pretty ridiculous arguments.
    @Integrity How is bestiality unnatural if it had been practiced since pre-historic times? (Cave painting in Val Comanica, in northern Italy depicts and man about to penetrate a doe)
    It has also been shown in paintings and sculptures throughout the world, even in some decorative sculpture on temples, and was actually accepted by society until the Bible wrote it off as wrong. It is not an unnatural occurrence, it is DEFINITELY not an uncommon occurrence, and humans aren’t the only species that does it.
    The same basic argument goes for homosexuality as well. Every species of mammal has been found to have homosexuals in it. A male giraffe will have more sex with other males than females in his lifetime, only resorting to a female for reproductive purposes. In ancient Greece, men were openly allowed to have intercourse with each other as long as they married a woman and had a family. Again, the Bible is the only thing that has actually brought humanity AWAY from it’s natural state.

  36. Gary says:

    Because GOD said so! I don’t understand why mere mortal man is forever questioning GOD. We don’t know where we come from or where we or going, yet we question GOD’s WORD. I believe if we really tried GOD and allowed his HOLY spirit on the inside (but the word expressly states “… He that cometh to GOD must believe that HE is…”) we would have the proof we need by things that can’t be proven by science and sheer logic. We walk by faith and not by sight. When we look at the subject from a spiritual perspective, we can then understand that these acts would upset the order that GOD has designed. ( Man in his image, man having dominion over the earth as a steward and shepherd of what belongs to GOD himself, that woman was created for man out of his own body and not just an animal that was created, the parallel of the relationship that man should have to CHRIST, and do note that sex was created for pleasure and procreation between a married couple (male and female, man and wo-man) who were already originally one. We fight not against flesh and blood but against spiritual wickedness. All children of GOD should be on the defense against theology and philosophy that aims (whether consciously or not) to destroy the authority of GOD in the earth. We have to be bold and courageous because others souls depend on us fighting for GOD ‘s will to be done in the earth.

  37. Gary says:

    Btw, the answer to the question specifically is that it should be illegal so that we that believe in Christianity and GOD can ensure that GOD’s will is performed in the earth. It’s why we vote for officials that believe similar to what we believe. They in turn will fight for our particular issues. Constitutionality is a different issue but we should vote and try to ensure that GOD’s will is done because at the end of GOD’s will is love for all and the hope of their salvation. If we allow any and everything, the line between what is constitutional and what is right and wrong becomes skewed. We should try to let our laws speak of a nation that is in GOD’s will. However, people will always do what they want to do and GOD will ultimately be the one that does the judging but we can live and fight for an environment that facilitates and not hinders GOD’s will.

  38. brown says:

    The author is probably a very twisted and sick person who wants to indulge into dog orgies or smth

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: